Skip to content

Choosing active hope

I have been reading and processing a lot of material about dying and grief, as part of an exploration of addressing grief in processes of organisational change.

Lots of reading lead to lots of self-reflection, and my own processing of grief for people lost and personal relationships – but also a huge and amorphous grief for the planet, and for the damage and destruction caused by humans to nature and wildlife, ecosystems and the biosphere.

I went through an intense period of impotent rage, feeling that a human extinction event would be fine right now, actually.

And then I came through the other side. Humans are still terrible, of course. I was listening to episodes of the podcast La Compagnie Générale des Autres (a play on the word compagnie: company as an organisation, and company as in being with others). The opening credits are extracts from different conversations spliced together, and amongst the audio samples, there is this:

“Le meilleur est toujours possible, par conséquent l’espérance est là, à condition de ne pas se laisser rendre indifférent.” (The best is always possible, therefore there is hope, as long as one does not allow oneself to become indifferent.)

The alternative I found to my impotent rage is hope as a deliberate choice, an active choice. Active hope, if you like.

Active Hope: How to Face the Mess We’re in without Going Crazy is a book by Joanna Macy and Chris Johnstone, by the way. I picked it up off my reading pile but the second-hand copy I got was so heavily annotated by the previous owner that I gave up and sourced a clean copy. I shall update.

When asked why she does the work she does (in an interview with Andrew Boyd, in I Want A Better Catastrophe), Joanna Macy said: “So that when things come apart, we will not turn on each other.”

So that when things come apart, we will not turn on each other.


A small plant is sprouting 4 green leaves in between a bunch of rusted rebar.

Photo by Faris Mohammed on Unsplash